Venom

One of the most iconic villains in the considerable rogues gallery belonging to the superhero Spider-Man, Venom has seemed to grow insanely popular instantly. First appearing in a cameo in Amazing Spider-Man 299 with the first full appearance in the landmark 300th issue in 1988 the history of the character and their creation is much more complex than first glance.

Officially, Venom is credited as being co-created by writer David Michelinie and artist Todd McFarlane, the alien costume goes back a few years earlier. For those that don’t know, Venom is a combination of an alien symbiote (later revealed to belong to a race called the Klyntar) and Eddie Brock, a human reporter who originally really, really hated Spider-Man. The costume though first appeared in Amazing Spider-Man 252 in 1984 by writers Tom Defalco/Roger Stern and artist Ron Frenz. The all new/all different black with a white spider living costume got a backstory in Secret Wars 8 published later the same year by Jim Shooter and Mike Zeck. For those that don’t know, Secret Wars had the heroes depart for the event in one issue (for Spidey it was Amazing 251) then return afterwards their next issue all changed and different. The intermitting changes were then explained during the events of the Secret Wars mini.

For a modern equivalent, think what DC did with ‘One Year Later’ and publishing 52 to show us the year we ‘missed’. Its an interesting storytelling device but the effectiveness of it is of course, up to debate. In any case, this is where Venom’s story begins…or does it?! Yes, it even gets even more convoluted than that as apparently the concept of the alien costume for Spider-Man which became a villain was concucted by fan Randy Schueller. Editor-In-Chief at the time, Jim Shooter bought the idea for $220 which given how much money Venom has made for the company puts this case alongside the Superman creators, Kirby family, Moore Watchmen controversy and more in terms of ‘creators getting rolled over by big corporations’ cause moneyyyyy’.

It does seem Schueller’s version was vastly different and Marvel even published a version of HIS version of the story in the one shot by Sensational Spider-Man: Self-Improvement by Peter David and Rick Leonardi in 2019 for Marvel’s 80th anniversary. It was okay from what I recall but even before we talk about Venom properly, the origin of the character seems to set up a lot of oddness and convolution that has followed the character since their proper introduction.

From what I understand, Venom was originally supposed to be a female villain who blamed Spider-Man for the death of her child. It was switched to Eddie Brock, a journalist who wrote a story exposing the identity of a serial killer known as the ‘Sin Eater’. He got the story wrong though which ruined his reputation, leaving him to write only for gossip papers. Elvis is my alien baby daddy and some such. He considered these beneath him and named himself ‘Venom’ because the work on the ‘lesser’ publications was like ‘poison’ to him.

So yes, Venom’s entire motivation is cause he didn’t double check his sources. Interestingly the Sin Eater story took place in the classic Death of Jean DeWolf arc that took place in Peter Parker: Spider-Man by Peter David and Rich Buckler in 1985 adding yet more ingredients in terms of creators to the Venom creation soup. Once Spider-Man abandoned the alien costume it found Eddie and they formed a mutual hatred of Spider-Man and set out for revenge.

Whether it was because of the long build, the great look, how threatening he was (incredibly sold by a nearly on the verge of a breakdown MJ) or when he appeared, Venom became an instant hit. Fans provided more and the company was more than willing to provide. When McFarlane left Amazing, Venom stayed but supposedly new artist Erik Larson found the character dull to draw. To entertain himself, Larson exaggerated Venom’s look with a long tongue, large teeth and an extended jaw. Even though McFarlane is more associated with Venom’s design, when people think Venom and how he looks, how thy picture the character is likely more influenced by these additions brought by Larson’s tenure on Amazing.

Never to miss a chance to milk something (often to the detriment of the quality of the figurative milk) Marvel went all in on a new hit character. Venom was made less scary, more of a wise cracking multi-layered thread who protected ‘innocents’ through a broken view of morality. These additions to Venom’s character allowed Marvel to move Venom from villain to anti-hero. He was able to have his own stories where he could fight his own villains/threats seperate from Spider-Man. In an attempt to further capitalise on Venom’s popularity and replace this new addition to Spider-Man’s rogues gallery, we saw the creation of Carnage…but that is a story for another day.

Venom kept his anti-hero or ‘Lethal Protector’ persona for the majority of the 90’s. There would only be brief tussles with Spider-Man who at this time was in the thick of the clone saga. The character became a slightly more threatening nuisance more than anything. There was a brief attempt to make Venom a full on antagonist again in the relaunch in the late 90’s by having Eddie/Venom blame Spider-Man for the death of his wife. Even then, Venom was more of a wisecracking threat who Spider-Man could dispatch with relative ease with a fire or loud noise.

I personally think the first real effort to make Venom scary and a true threat again came from the pages of the relaunched Spectacular Spider-Man in 2003 courtesy of Paul Jenkins and Humberto Ramos. The storyline ‘The hunger’ saw Eddie discovering he had developed cancer and the symbiote was keeping him alive. The nightmarish/parasitic way Ramos drew scene’s between Eddie and the Symbiote were effective in portraying the human host as a victim in a problematic pairing.

Shortly after, Eddie sold the Symbiote at auction (no really) and it ended up eventually on the body of Mac Gargan, the Scorpion. Devastated that his actions had caused the symbiote to fall into the wrong hands (not exactly a stretch given he was selling it an underground auction but Eddie was never the brightest) Eddie attempted suicide but survived. This resulted in a brief period where Marvel had a pure villain in a new Venom and also made Eddie a vindictive, creepy non-powered threat when he tried to kill Aunt May when she was in the hospital following the gunshot that resulted from the Spider-Man unmasking.

I felt the turn of a more grounded, sinister non-Venom Eddie was areally effective and interesting. However, Marvel saw their chance to have their cake and eat it too by having Mac Gargen Venom (who was now on the Norman Osborn Thunderbolts and would later masquerade as a new Spider-Man on the Avengers) as a villain and have Eddie be a new anti-hero called anti-Venom. This new form of the character took form during the Brand New Day period of Amazing Spider-Man involving creators Dan Slott and John Romita JR.

I don’t think Anti-Venom really took off like Marvel hoped. Once again, Venom was placed in the role of anti-hero with the emphasis on the hero part more than ever with a new host in Flash Thompson. Working for the government and a new version of Project Rebirth (the one that created Captain America), disabled veteran Flash Thompson volunteered to be a new black ops Venom working on convert missions. During this period, the symbiote would battle for control with Flash in the ‘Agent Venom’ era which lasted a considerable amount of time.

There was also a brief Venom run with a new host, Lee Price who I’m sure you forgot you existed until I reminded you and you will then forget again shortly. The original Eddie/Symbiote team was reunited leading to the extended run by Donny Cates, Ryan Stegman and others. This run led to a considerable amount of lore being added to the Symbiote race including their origins and their mythology.

In terms of my experiences with the character, I was first introduced to Venom and a lot of the Spider-Man anthology through the 90’s animated show. As a young boy, seeing a cool as hell looking evil Spider-Man with a sharp teeth and long tongue appear right before the name of the show appears makes you go ‘Ooooo who’s that.’ Indeed, for a large part of Venom’s existence and success has been due to a great look and how instantly appealing he is to non comic fans. What is it about that character that makes him more appealing that villains that are older or arguably better? Its hard to say.

Most of it is the look, if you saw Venom on a badass cover to a Metallica album as opposed to a comic cover you wouldn’t blink. He has a huge appeal to the majority of male readers as someone who can do anything Spider-Man can do but without the pesky morals that saddles Marvel’s top character. Where Spidey might ask you to put down the piece of fruit you just stole, Venom will eat you, the fruit and likely the owner of the store too, just cause. This was something I think Marvel was smart to play into to by making Venom more ‘ha ha’ and less ‘Oh dear lord, he’s gonna kill me.’ The more comedic, silly, doesn’t give a damn’ pure ‘badass’ version of Venom is the one most people think of due to to him being portrayed like this in the majority of his appearances in cartoons, video games and soon to be three big screen movie. He’s a funner version of the Punisher who I’ve spoken about before in terms of how and why he appeals to an audience outside of comics.

Personally I prefer the legitimate threat Venom or the heroic version Cates and Stegman crafted. Largely as an anti-hero, I felt that Venom became deleted, replaced by villains who never seemed as interesting because they were one dimensional (Carnage) or forgettable(nearly every other Symbiote character). The characters mainstream popularity and how much value he has brought to Marvel since his debut in 40 years or so of existence is probably much better money wise for the company than he ever could have meant as a villain to be protected as a true threat but we’ll never know what could have been.

As new aspects to the character are introduced, more hosts and the current run ending and this years Venom movie seemingly being the last, we’ll see where Venom’s more complex than first appearance story takes the character next. Given that I believe the characters projector is somewhat unpredictable, maybe he’ll end up as a game show host for ‘Eat Your Brains: Live’.

I admit, I’d watch it.

More soon.

Black Panther

In my journey as a comic fan, one character who has become a key focus in Marvel’s universe in Black Panther was never hugely on my radar. My earliest memories of the character were either in the Iron Man or Fantastic Four cartoons from the 90’s I think. In comics, I believe I only knew them from when the Avenger’s showed up and sometimes Black Panther was there, sometimes he wasn’t.

I remember seeing the singles of Christopher Priest’s iconic run from the early 2000’s on the shelves but I had no idea about the wider Marvel universe apart from what I gathered from osmosis. As I gathered more knowledge, my first real memory of seeing Black Panther playing a significant role in comics I was reading was during Civil War. First we saw Black Panther invited to be a founding member of the Illuminati, saying it was a bad idea and leaving. In that one shot prelude to Civil War by Brian Michael Bendis and Alex Maleev that saw the Illuminati form and later, shoot Hulk into space had the proposal of the group be based on a unanimous vote. I always found it interesting that the group comprised of Iron Man, Professor X, Mr. Fantastic, Black Bolt and Namor formed despite T’Challa voting not to go along with the proposal. I thought initially it was an interesting flaw in the origins of the group but when Bendis was asked why the group formed despite T’Challa voting no he embodied the spirit of George Lucas denying Han shot first and stated the vote was unanimously yes even though there being a clear no vote.

His main role in Civil War was getting married to Storm in the run written at the time by Reggie Hudlin. I remember seeing the ads for the start of the series with art by John Romita JR who was and still is a favourite of mine so that sticks in my mind. I also knew of Hudlin because he wrote 10 issues of Marvel Knight’s Spider-Man following the 12 issue Mark Millar run and before the title was relaunched with the same numbering and Sensational Spider-Man.I remember also following Civil War, Black Panther and Storm replaced Mr. Fantastic and the Invisible Woman on the Fantastic Four in a brief run written by the late, great Dwayne McDuffie. There was a lot of controversy at the time I recall that Black Panther was able to put the Silver Surfer in a full nelson hold. It just shows that even before social media where fans pick everything apart, this was still happening in the days before it became prevalent when fans argued over ridiculous things on message boards instead.

Like a lot of heroes at the time, Black Panther joined the pantheon of many characters that I knew existed but didn’t have much more than a surface knowledge of. I knew now that he was introduced in Lee/Kirby Fantastic Four, was one of the first prominent black superheroes and a few things about Wakanda and such. He showed up in Kurt Busiek’s Avenger’s briefly but I’m sure like a lot of people not familiar with the comics, I was got a wider exposure to Black Panther, Wakanda, etc through the movie Captain America: Civil War and then the Black Panther starring the legend that was Chadwick Boseman.The character got a more prominent place in the Marvel universe with a new title written by acclaimed novelist Ta-Nehisi Coates and a whole lot more titles centring around Wakanda and the characters who had been introduced globally through the aforementioned Black Panther movie. I would say that Marvel comics have lost somewhat of an interest in keeping the character as prevalent in recent years but the company tends to get bored quickly of their passion projects that are left to sink or swim before they remember to come back to it later on,I finally decided to read some Black Panther comics when the Christopher Priest run got the omnibus treatment.

This is one of (if not the) definitive run and I’m a big fan of Priest, especially after reading his recent Deathstroke work. Its a very dense read that’s more like a political thriller with Black Panther antagonists like Killmonger attacking Wakanda and the like with economics as well as his fists.Still even though I only understand perhaps 5% of it at times, its deeply compelling and its clear Christopher Priest is a writer with a lot on his mind and does an excellent job using a narrative involving people in costumes to put them across.Its always fun for me to drop in on a character I’m not familiar with and expand my reading horizons a little. I might never read another Black Panther run but I always enjoy thinking about my own journey with certain characters and maybe (hopefully) I’ve made you think a little about that too.

More soon.

Canon

Canon in terms of what does and doesn’t count can be a funny thing and as a fan often confusing. For those that may not be aware, canon is something in storytelling when a huge franchise (say Star Wars or Marvel) has an official story about what happens to who and the universe at large. This is the ‘canon’ and there can be stories out of that (like Marvel’s ‘What If’ animated series) that can be entertaining but aren’t part of the official story.

The longer a franchise exists and the more creators are involved means that canon can get convoluted. Fans will hotly debate about what is/isn’t canon in some cases.It can got very convoluted in the cases of franchises like say Terminator where repeated attempts to make the franchise successful again have had films that were canon be disregarded. First all of Terminator 1-4 was canon, then 1 and 5 then one and 6. This isn’t even taking into account the television show which also spun out of Terminator 2, pushing aside everything else.

Then when you get to franchises like Star Trek, Star Wars and Doctor Who who have all sorts of novels, TV shows, games and more where what is and what is not considered canon can be considerably mirky. when Disney bought Star Wars/Lucasfilm they said that anything apart from the 6 movies and the Clone Wars animated series was now no longer official canon. This made a lot of long time Star Wars fans upset that certain characters and events had been snapped away by Disney in a moment.

Similar things have happened in Doctor Who fandom to the extent that some of the novels written were adapted into episodes and even comics as most recently as ‘The Star Beast’. Then when it comes to comics, it can be possibly the most complicated. When you get characters that have been around 50, 60, 70 or 80 years with hundreds or thousands of creative voices writing their narrative, canon can get more than a little murky. Just in recent years, characters Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver were changed from mutants who were Magneto’s children (which was in itself a change in canon some time ago) were revealed not to be in the years prior to the FOX entertainment buyout and Disney higher ups were being grumpy about all things related to X-Men and Fantastic Four.

A few weeks ago I was talking to someone about how in the late 90’s, writer/artist John Byrne wrote and drew a Spider-Man series ‘Chapter One’ which reimagined the classic Lee/Ditko stories from the first year or so of Amazing with a more modern flair. Nothing wrong with that in principle but the new reimagined origin was added as the official canon without explanation in the main Spider-Man books at the time. This even led to a story in Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 2) 9 and 10 where a character tied to this specific origin appeared. When this odd experiment was abandoned, all references to this ‘new’ origin were abandoned as everything since was reverted back to the original story as depicted in Amazing Fantasy 15.

Canon can be a headache, sometimes I see fans twist themselves into knots over the slightest error in regards to it. Should they happen? Ideally not but I don’t think strictly adhering to every small amount of Canon should stop telling someone from being able to craft whatever story they want. Of course, we don’t want huge changes that aren’t explained because that’s just poor storytelling but something small here and there? Not a big deal.

I think canon can also be a personal thing. Going back to Disney and them doing away with the expanded Star Wars universe, some fans were horrified especially when they ended up disappointed with the new stories offered in some cases. I think though unless the company takes away your own items you can still have those books be ‘your’ version of the mythos if you want. I’ve seen some interesting videos about the constant Terminator changes in canon could arguably be all made into one coherent story where John Connor and Skynet have engaged into a time travel game of proverbial chess against each other.

I’m personally not a fan of any of the Matrix films apart from the first. No shade to those who enjoy the rest but in my mind, the first is so good and has a near perfect ending that the subsequent four movies aren’t my canon. I’ve met Star Wars fans who only have their canon be the original version of the first three films. I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with that. Canon after all is largely in reference to fictional stories so if there’s a part of the story you don’t like as much as others and you can create a mental barrier around it…why not?

As fandom’s grow and the ability to communicate with each other around the world gets easier, Canon can also be a new tool for gatekeeping. ‘You’re not a real fan if you don’t know this or you don’t consider this or that canon’. It’s a troublesome part of modern fandom I could personally do without. Real world history is important, fictional isn’t. I think leave it up to the individual rather than argue with people over what isn’t or isn’t ‘counting’.

In my view, life’s too short and although history can be fun it is also something we have to take on partly as a necessary of life. It’s another weight we have to add to our own growth and development. Why would we add to that by applying that same weight to something we’re supposed to be enjoying?

Just a thought.

More soon.